Compliance evidence
Assignments, completions, scores, acknowledgments, certificates, versions, and follow-up records help answer a documented training request. They do not establish coverage, legal compliance, or resilience by themselves.
What managers can actually review
A useful report should distinguish records of participation from practice decisions. CyberPrimer presents both, with qualifications about what each measure can show.
Open the sample evidence demo →Assignments, completions, scores, acknowledgments, certificates, versions, and follow-up records help answer a documented training request. They do not establish coverage, legal compliance, or resilience by themselves.
Risk Pulse can show safe choices in scenario labs, explicit safe simulation responses, time from delivery to the recorded safe choice, correction counts, and recovery after coaching. Counts show denominators or an unavailable state when there is no data.
Managers can inspect simulation events separately from mail scanner visits. A disputed failure can be excluded from counts and export with a reason while preserving the original event. Difficulty differences and unobserved real-world reporting limit trend interpretation.
The examples below contain fictional data. Outcome analysis can begin only after subscribed US customers use the program across comparable training periods. Any published customer result would also require the customer's permission, careful review of sample size and measurement limits, and removal of identifying information. There are no live customer outcome claims here.
The fictional executive, insurer, and administrator examples below show distinct questions and caveats. They are previews, not actual customer outcomes.
No. It documents a recorded completion, not a validated reduction in incident risk.
Yes. The event is retained and a manager correction with a reason is added to the timeline.